Mandamus Cases: Miscellaneous (Court of Appeals)

Ohio Workers’ Compensation Decisions
(Court of Appeals)

Mandamus: Miscellaneous

Select the case name to read the decision on the Ohio Supreme Court’s web site. For other issues, see our topic index to Ohio workers’ compensation decisions.

Bledsoe, State ex rel. v. Indus. Comm. (12/12/02)

Commission did not have legal duty to comply with internal Commission memorandum.

Vote: 3-0
Opinion by: Judge Petree
Appellate District: 10

Casto, State ex rel. v. Indus. Comm. (3/19/13, posted 3/19/13)

Party asserting affirmative defense not entitled to mandamus relief where record does not demonstrate that it raised issue administratively.

Vote: 3-0
Opinion by: Judge Dorrian
Appellate District: 10

Menough, State ex rel. v. Indus. Comm. (6/25/02)

Mandamus will not issue to compel vain act.

Vote: 3-0
Opinion by: Judge Petree
Appellate District: 10

Ohio State Univ., State ex rel. v. Indus. Comm. (7/24/07)

Employer which did not raise issue of whether C-84 supported ongoing temporary total before Commission or Magistrate waived issue.

Vote: 3-0
Opinion by: Judge Brown
Appellate District: 10

Sitterly, State ex rel. v. Indus. Comm. (6/27/02)

Complaint for writ of mandamus is premature where Commission has not yet reached final ruling on permanent partial application. Commission exercise of continuing jurisdiction is proper because Commission identified specific legal error justifying grant of reconsideration.

Vote: 3-0
Opinion by: Judge Klatt
Appellate District: 10

YRC, State ex rel. Inc. v. Hood (5/18/10)

When Commission denied permanent total for other reasons, employer could not bring mandamus challenge to decision in order that injured worker did not voluntarily abandon his employment because issue was not ripe for review.

Vote: 3-0
Opinion by: Judge Sadler
Appellate District: 10