Employer Cases: Classification / Reclassification (Supreme Court)

Ohio Workers’ Compensation Decisions
(Supreme Court)

Employer: Classification / Reclassification

Select the case name to read the decision on the Ohio Supreme Court’s web site. For other issues, see our topic index to Ohio workers’ compensation decisions.

Cafaro Mgt. Co., State ex rel. v. Kielmeyer (3/21/07)

BWC did not err in reclassifying clerical and security employees for purposes of determining employer’s premiums.

Vote: 7-0
Opinion by: Per Curiam

Craftsmen Basement Finishing Sys., Inc., State ex rel. v. Ryan (4/15/09)

BWC must adequately explain decision to reclassify employees so that reviewing court could understand reason for reclassifying when decision to reclassify was not self-explanatory.

Vote: 7-0
Opinion by: Per Curiam

Ohio Aluminum Industries, Inc., State ex rel. v. Indus. Comm. (10/16/02)

Bureau’s classification of employer’s business (for premium determination) was not unreasonable and was supported by some evidence.

Vote: 7-0
Opinion by: Per Curiam

RMS of Ohio, Inc., State ex rel. v. Ohio Bur. of Workers’ Comp. (4/4/07)

BWC did not err in reclassifying business for purpose of determining workers’ compensation premium rates.

Vote: 7-0
Opinion by: Per Curiam

Roberds, Inc., State ex rel. v. Conrad (8/25/99)

Bureau of Workers’ Compensation correctly categorized employer’s employees for purposes of determining premium to be paid.

Vote: 7-0
Opinion by: Per Curiam