Continuing Jurisdiction Cases: Mistake of Fact (Supreme Court)

Ohio Workers’ Compensation Decisions
(Supreme Court)

Continuing Jurisdiction: Mistake of Fact

Select the case name to read the decision on the Ohio Supreme Court’s web site. For other issues, see our topic index to Ohio workers’ compensation decisions.

Gobich, State ex rel. v. Indus. Comm. (11/24/04)

Disagreement over interpretation of facts does not justify exercise of continuing jurisdiction to review order.

Vote: 6-1
Opinion by: Per Curiam

Meris, State ex rel. v. Indus. Comm. (2/8/06)

Doctors’ lack of knowledge of jobs held at a time earlier than the permanent total application did not affect claimant’s condition at the time of the examinations and did not constitute a mistake of fact which would support Commission exercise of continuing jurisdiction.

Vote: 6-0, 1 concurs in judgment only
Opinion by: Per Curiam