| The following
information is provided courtesy of the Ohio Workers'
Compensation Bulletin. For information about the Bulletin
click
here.
Temporary
Total Continued after Firing Due to Absenteeism Resulting from Injury
State,
ex rel. NIFCO, L.L.C. v. Woods (12/4/03),
Franklin App. No. 02AP-6468, 2003-Ohio-6468:
Issue: Does an employee who is receiving
temporary total disability compensation and is then fired because of
absenteeism resulting from the injury remain eligible for temporary
total?
Background: Woods suffered a shoulder injury at
work. She was incapable of working her job as a result of the injury,
and she was awarded temporary total disability.
The Employer fired Woods based on its absenteeism
policy. In calculating "points" under this policy, the Employer
included days that Woods missed work as a result of being temporarily
and totally disabled.
The Commission continued temporary total compensation
after Woods was terminated. The Employer filed a writ of mandamus
contending that Woods was not entitled to temporary total because she
abandoned her employment when she was fired because of violating the
Employer's attendance policy.
Decision: Court of Appeals denies writ.
The abandonment doctrine bars temporary total where an injured worker
has voluntarily abandoned their employment. Normally, if an employee is
fired for violating a work rule, the employee is considered to have
abandoned their employment.
However, that doctrine does not apply in the present case. The Court
notes that the periods of work missed were due to the industrial
injury. In State ex rel. Pretty
Products, Inc. v. Indus. Comm. (1996), 77 Ohio St.3d 5, the Ohio
Supreme Court found that where an employee is fired as a result of
absenteeism resulting from an industrial injury, the loss of employment
is not considered "voluntary."
The Employer also claimed that the absenteeism should not be found due
to the industrial injury because the Employer claimed it had offered a
lighter duty job, within Woods' work restrictions, which was refused.
Court also rejects this claim. Court points out that Ohio
Administrative Code 4121-3-32(A)(6) requires a written job offer in
order to terminate temporary total. Court applies that rule to this
situation, which it characterizes as the employer attempting to
"preclude" compensation.
Click on the case name
to view the decision on
the Supreme
Court's web site.
|