| The following
information is provided courtesy of the Ohio Workers'
Compensation Bulletin. For information about the Bulletin
click
here.
Claimant
Replaced after Strike Remains Eligible for Temporary
Total
State,
ex rel.
Angell Mfg. Co. v. Long (12/4/03), Franklin App. No.
02AP-1389,
2003-Ohio-6469:
Issue: Does an injured worker who was
replaced by the Employer after participating in a lawful strike remain
eligible for temporary total?
Background: Long was injured at work. She worked
restricted duty until her union went on strike.
During the strike, the Employer hired replacement
workers. Therefore, when the strike ended Long was not permitted to
return to work because she had been replaced. Although she was subject
to recall, she was never recalled.
An SHO denied temporary total for the period of the
strike.
After that period, Long needed surgery due to her
injury. Her doctor certified her as temporarily and totally disabled.
The Commission ordered temporary total paid. The Employer filed a
mandamus action to challenge the award.
Decision: Court refuses writ sought by
employer.
Initially, the Court finds that the first denial of
temporary total does not bar subsequent temporary total. The Employer
had argued that the first temporary total denial operated as a finding
that Long was ineligible for temporary total. Instead, the Court views
it as a limited finding that temporary total is denied based on the
fact that Long was on strike during the period of claimed temporary
total.
The Court next rejects the argument that a claimant who
engages in a strike has "voluntarily abandoned" their employment. The
court notes that R.C. § 4123.61, the statute which explains how to
calculate the average weekly wage, indicates that time a worker is off
work due to participation in a lawful strike is designated as a period
of unemployment beyond the control of the injured worker.
Therefore, the Court says that being off work as the
result of a strike is not the same as being fired for violating a
written work rule and Long is not considered to have voluntarily
abandoned her employment. As a result, she has not lost eligibility for
temporary total compensation.
Click on the case name
to view the decision on
the Supreme
Court's web site.
|