Stewart Jaffy &: Assoc. Co., LPA, Attorneys at Law
A Legal Professional Association
306 E. Gay Street, Columbus, OH  43315  
Tel: 614/228-6148

Stewart Jaffy & Assoc Home Page Site Index About Stewart Jaffy & Associates Ohio Workers' Compensation Information Ohio AFL-CIO Workers' Compensation Manual Social Security Disability Links
Posted: August, 1998 Please read our legal notice.
Search
Stewart Jaffy & Assoc.
Firm Information
Our Lawyers
Directions
Ohio Workers' Compensation
Ohio Workers' Compensation Guide/FAQ
Rate Information
(1987 to present)
Current News
News Archives
(1996 to present)
Recent Ohio Supreme Court Decisions
Ohio Workers' Compensation Decision Summaries
(1998 to present)
Site Index
XML/RSS
The following information is provided courtesy of the Ohio Workers' Compensation Bulletin. For information about the Bulletin click here.

Injured Worker with Psychiatric Only Claim Can Sue Employer for Negligence

Bunger v. Lawson Co. (8/5/98), 82 Ohio St.3d 463:

In Bunger v. Lawson Co. the Supreme Court has found that an injured worker who suffers a psychiatric only injury can sue the employer for negligence.

Under Ohio's law such a claim is not compensable as an injury because R.C. 4123.01(C) excludes psychiatric only claims. The Supreme Court ignored a constitutional challenge to this exclusion.

Instead, the Court held that the provisions of the Workers' Compensation law which provide an employer with immunity from a negligence suit by an employee for injuries sustained in their employment do not apply where the type of injury is not covered under the Workers' Compensation Law.

The Supreme Court held in the syllabus of this case:

R.C. 4123.01(C) and 4123.74 do not foreclose an employee who has suffered purely psychological injuries from pursuing a common-law remedy against his or her employer.

The majority ignored the issue of whether or not the exclusion of psychiatric only claims from the workers' compensation system was constitutional. The Supreme Court has never ruled on the issue of whether the exclusion of psychiatric only claims violates the constitution. This was the basis of Justice Douglas' dissent:

I dissent from the decision of the majority because, in my judgment, the provisions of R.C. Chapter 4123 that attempt to exclude purely psychological injuries from compensability under the Workers' Compensation Act violate principles of equal protection. There is no rational justification for allowing workers' compensation benefits for broken bones but not for broken minds. I would hold that if appellant can show a mental injury, then appellant has protection under the Workers' Compensation Act and, thus, has entitlement to workers' compensation benefits for her purely psychological injuries. Subjecting Ohio employers to civil liability in such cases is clearly not the answer.

Click on the case name to view the  decision on the Supreme Court's web site.



Stewart Jaffy & Associates Co., LPA | Attorneys at Law
306 E. Gay St. | Columbus, OH 43215
Telephone: (614) 228-6148 | Fax: (614) 228-6140
http://www.jaffylaw.com

.