Stewart Jaffy &: Assoc. Co., LPA, Attorneys at Law
A Legal Professional Association
306 E. Gay Street, Columbus, OH  43315  
Tel: 614/228-6148

Stewart Jaffy & Assoc Home Page Site Index About Stewart Jaffy & Associates Ohio Workers' Compensation Information Ohio AFL-CIO Workers' Compensation Manual Social Security Disability Links
Posted: December, 1997 Please read our legal notice.
Search
Stewart Jaffy & Assoc.
Firm Information
Our Lawyers
Directions
Ohio Workers' Compensation
Ohio Workers' Compensation Guide/FAQ
Rate Information
(1987 to present)
Current News
News Archives
(1996 to present)
Recent Ohio Supreme Court Decisions
Ohio Workers' Compensation Decision Summaries
(1998 to present)
Site Index
XML/RSS
The following information is provided courtesy of the Ohio Workers' Compensation Bulletin. For information about the Bulletin click here.

Intentional Tort Statute Declared Unconstitutional

In Johnson v. BP Chemicals (11/18/97), Allen No. 1-97-32, the Third Appellate District has ruled the Ohio Intentional Tort statute, R.C. 2745.01 unconstitutional.

Johnson involves a claim against the BP Chemical facility in Lima. An employee of BP was injured due to spray heads which failed. The employee contends that the employer was aware of a dangerous condition which led to the injury, and failed to take safeguards.

The Court of Common Pleas dismissed the claim for failure to establish an intentional tort under the statutory definition.

The Court of Appeals reversed the Common Pleas Court.

The Court of Appeals says that the intentional tort statute (R.C. 2745.01) violates Equal Protection. The statute provides a higher standard for an employment intentional tort -- an employment intentional tort exists under the statute only if there is proof by "clear and convincing" evidence that the employer "deliberately and intentionally" injured the employee.

The Court says (1) no legitimate government interest exists for different treatment of victims who are employees and victims who are not employees; (2) there is no legitimate government interest for imposing a higher burden of proof.

The Court ovserves that there is no legitimate interest in restricting a victims recovery based on his employment status. The Court notes that to require "deliberate and intentional acts" proven by "clear and convincing evidence" creates a virtually insurmountable obstacle for victims.

Note: On April 14, 1999, the Ohio Supreme Court declared the employment intentional tort statute unconstitutional in Johnson v. BP Chemicals. To read a summary of the Supreme Court's decision, click here.

Before the Supreme Court's decision, the First and Fifth District Courts of Appeals had also declared the intentional tort statute unconstitutional. Summaries of those decisions are also available:

 


Stewart Jaffy & Associates Co., LPA | Attorneys at Law
306 E. Gay St. | Columbus, OH 43215
Telephone: (614) 228-6148 | Fax: (614) 228-6140
http://www.jaffylaw.com

.