Stewart Jaffy & Assoc., 306 E. Gay St., Columbus OH 43209
Sign up for our free Ohio Workers' Compensation Quarterly email

XML/RSS

Wage Loss Cases: Medical Requirements

(Supreme Court)

Click on the case name to read the decision on the Ohio Supreme Court's web site.  Decisions which adopt the decision of a lower court or Magistrate, or which decide a case based on a previous decision, are excluded. 

Babcock, State ex rel. v. ENSR Corp. (7/1/98)

Wage loss compensation must be based on allowed condition. However, non-allowed condition does not bar wage loss compensation if the allowed condition causes sufficient disability to entitle the injured worker to wage loss compensation.

Vote: 5-2
Opinion by: Per Curiam

Frederick, State ex rel. v. Licking Cty. Dept. of Human Serv. (6/24/98)

If allowed condition does not prevent injured worker from returning to former position of employment, injured worker is not entitled to wage loss compensation. Where injured worker has been laid off, but was capable of performing their former position of employment, the injured worker is not entitled to wage loss. If allowed condition does prevent injured worker from returning to former position of employment, injured worker can be entitled to wage loss compensation, regardless of whether the job has been abolished.

Vote: 7-0
Opinion by: Per Curiam

Jaynor, State ex rel. v. The Gerstenslager Co. (12/22/99)

Wage loss is not payable when the injured worker is earning as much as before the injury. Nor can wage loss be paid when there is not medical evidence demonstrating that the inability to return to the former position of employment is due to the allowed condition(s).

Vote: 7-0
Opinion by: Per Curiam

WCI Steel, Inc., State ex rel. v. Indus. Comm. (7/10/02)

Non-allowed conditions are irrelevant, if allowed conditions are disabling.  Therefore doctor's report, on form provided by Bureau, which indicated inability to work was due to allowed conditions supported wage loss even if report made reference to disabilities in additional parts of the body (which was information requested by Bureau).  Doctor's report was not inconsistent where doctor in narrative limited claimant to lifting 15 pounds, and checked on Bureau form that claimant could never lift 10-20 pounds, because answers were consistent.

Vote: 7-0
Opinion by: Per Curiam
Common Ohio Workers' Compensation Terms Explained

Injured at Work?


Stewart Jaffy & Associates can help you receive the workers’ compensation benefits you are entitled to.  We are based in Columbus and represent injured workers throughout Ohio before the BWC, Industrial Commission and in court.

We also represent people who have social security disability claims or who have a disability claim before another state administrative agency (PERS, STRS, SERS or police and fire fighters disability).

Initial consultations with potential clients are free.  If you are interested in talking with us about a potential case, call us at (614) 228-6148. 
Stewart Jaffy & Associates Co., LPA | Attorneys at Law 
306 E. Gay St. | Columbus, OH 43215
Telephone: (614) 228-6148 | Fax: (614) 228-6140 
http://www.jaffylaw.com


  Please read our legal notice.