Stewart Jaffy & Assoc., 306 E. Gay St., Columbus OH 43209
Sign up for our free Ohio Workers' Compensation Quarterly email

XML/RSS

Trial Practice Cases: Notice of Appeal/Complaint

(Court of Appeals)

Click on the case name to read the decision on the Ohio Supreme Court's web site.  Decisions which adopt the decision of a lower court or Magistrate, or which decide a case based on a previous decision, are excluded. 

Autozone, Inc. v. Mercer  (12/2/02)

Employer's notice of  appeal to common pleas court substantially complied with requirements and provided sufficient information to understand what order employer was appealing; even though notice of appeal referenced wrong order, a copy of the correct order was attached.

Vote: 3-0
Opinion by: Judge Valen
Appellate District: 12

Connelly v. Parma Community Gen. Hosp. (7/15/04)

Notice of appeal which listed proper employer, claim number and party appealing, and was served with complaint listing procedural history was valid even though it listed the wrong order because it was in substantial compliance with requirements for valid notice of appeal.

Vote: 3-0
Opinion by: Judge Gallagher
Appellate District: 8

Franklin v. DaimlerChrysler Corp. (10/27/06)

Court improperly dismissed workers' compensation case in employer's appeal where claimant was unrepresented and was not provided with sufficient notice that failure to file a complaint would result in the dismissal of his claim.

Vote: 2-1
Opinion by: Judge Singer
Appellate District: 6

Hamilton v. Cuyahoga Community College (6/15/06)

Employer's notice of appeal which referenced wrong hearing was in substantial compliance with statutory requirements because it put claimant on notice of what was being appealed.

Vote: 3-0
Opinion by: Judge McMonagle
Appellate District: 8

Hazuka v. Ford Motor Co. (1/21/03)

R.C. 4123.512 requires claimants to file individual appeals.  Multiple claimants cannot file combined notice of appeal against employer.

Vote: 2-1
Opinion by: Judge Wise
Appellate District: 5

Howard v. Penske Logistics, L.L.C. (8/27/08)

Attempted R.C. 4123.512 appeal which did not indicate what order was being appealed and which did not notify all parties of the attempt to appeal was not in substantial compliance and did not provide the trial court with jurisdiction over the appeal.

Vote: 3-0
Opinion by: Judge Whitmore
Appellate District: 9

Hughes v. Fed. Mogul Ignition Co. (4/26/07)

Trial court properly granted judgement to employer when injured worker failed to re-file complaint within one year of Rule 41(A) dismissal as required by savings statute.

Vote: 3-0
Opinion by: Judge Wise
Appellate District: 5

Klamfoth v. Advanced Founds. Solutions (9/3/09)

Where employer was dismissed as party because complaint was not properly served upon it, employer is entitled to dismissal of appeal because it is a necessary party under R.C. 4123.512.

Vote: 3-0
Opinion by: Judge Brown
Appellate District: 10

Klepinger v. Alterra Healthcare Corp. (7/27/07)

Claimant who failed to timely file complaint in response to employer's 4123.512 appeal must be given chance to respond before court grants judgment for employer.

Vote: 3-0
Opinion by: Judge Brogan
Appellate District: 2

Lehman v. Buehrer (3/8/12)

Notice of Appeal which contained wrong information about employer, claim number and date of injury does not substantially comply with R.C. 4123.512 requirements.  Errors in notice of appeal cannot be corrected by reference to complaint.

Vote: 3-0
Opinion by: Judge Celebrezze
Appellate District:
 8

Leibas v. USX Corp. (3/27/03)

Multiple claimants can file single notice of appeal against employer, as long as notice of appeal meets requirements of R.C. 4123.512.  Trial court can determine whether claims should remain joined or should be severed.

Vote: 3-0
Opinion by: Judge Carr
Appellate District: 9

McCoy-Hedges v. Conrad (10/24/02)

R.C. 4123.512 appeal must be filed within 60 days of receipt of Industrial Commission order.  Appeal filed within 60 days of receipt of reconsideration order, but over 90 days after receipt of Commission order is not timely because appeal period is not extended by filing motion for reconsideration with Commission.

Vote: 3-0
Opinion by: Judge Klatt
Appellate District: 10

Richardson v. Indus. Comm. (5/29/09)

Purported notice of appeal which failed to provide information about the worker's compensation claim the party was attempting to  appeal and which appeared to seek an investigation of events was not sufficient to substantially comply with R.C. 4123.512's requirements for a notice of appeal from an Industrial Commission decision.

Vote: 3-0
Opinion by: Judge Fain
Appellate District: 2

Robinson v. Target Corp. (5/26/11)

60 day appeal period runs from time of second (corrected) Commission order which correctly listed date of the appeal being ruled on, rather than from time of first order which listed an incorrect appeal date.

Vote: 2-1
Opinion by: Judge Tyack
Appellate District:
 10

Spencer v. FHI, L.L.C. (10/29/10)

Failure to serve Administrator with notice of appeal was not jurisdictional and trial court improperly dismissed case and denied motion to amend complaint to add Administrator as party.

Vote: 3-0
Opinion by: Judge Grady
Appellate District:
 2

Stanley v. Union Metal Corp.  (5/10/04)

Trial court improperly granted employer's motion for default judgment based on claimant's failure to timely file complaint in employer appeal where claimant had filed motion for leave to file untimely complaint and court did not rule on that motion.  Motion for leave to file must be considered because policy favors deciding cases on the merits and claimants must be given opportunity to show that the failure to timely file complaint was due to excusable neglect or good cause.

Vote: 3-0
Opinion by: Judge Hoffman
Appellate District: 5

Swartzwelder v . Ryan (2/23/09)

Notice to non-attorney representative is sufficient notice to representative for purposes of calculating 60 day period to file appeal because statute does not say date is calculated from receipt of notice by attorney representative.

Vote: 3-0
Opinion by: Judge Moore
Appellate District: 9

Teague v. LTV Steel Co. (3/13/03)

Where record did not indicate what day claimant received Industrial Commission's denial of claim, Common Pleas court improperly dismissed appeal as untimely.

Vote: 3-0
Opinion by: Judge Donofrio
Appellate District: 7

Wilkerson v. Internatl Truck & Engine Corp. (2/27/09)

Unrepresented injured worker was not put on notice by employer's notice of appeal that she was required to do anything and therefore trial court erred in dismissing her claim for failure to timely file complaint.

Vote: 3-0
Opinion by: Judge Brogan
Appellate District: 2
Common Ohio Workers' Compensation Terms Explained

Injured at Work?


Stewart Jaffy & Associates can help you receive the workers’ compensation benefits you are entitled to.  We are based in Columbus and represent injured workers throughout Ohio before the BWC, Industrial Commission and in court.

We also represent people who have social security disability claims or who have a disability claim before another state administrative agency (PERS, STRS, SERS or police and fire fighters disability).

Initial consultations with potential clients are free.  If you are interested in talking with us about a potential case, call us at (614) 228-6148. 
Stewart Jaffy & Associates Co., LPA | Attorneys at Law 
306 E. Gay St. | Columbus, OH 43215
Telephone: (614) 228-6148 | Fax: (614) 228-6140 
http://www.jaffylaw.com


  Please read our legal notice.