Stewart Jaffy & Assoc., 306 E. Gay St., Columbus OH 43209
Sign up for our free Ohio Workers' Compensation Quarterly email

XML/RSS

Permanent Total Cases: Miscellaneous

(Supreme Court)

Click on the case name to read the decision on the Ohio Supreme Court's web site.  Decisions which adopt the decision of a lower court or Magistrate, or which decide a case based on a previous decision, are excluded. 

AT&T, Inc., State ex rel. v. McGraw (10/15/08)

An injured worker who was receiving permanent total was not ineligible for permanent total based on activities in shop owned by wife when those activities were not remunerated or inconsistent with the injured worker's physical limitations; additionally, even if the activities were considered to be employment, they would not bar permanent total because there was no evidence that the injured worker was capable of performing them on a sustained basis.

Vote: 7-0
Opinion by: Per Curiam

Baker, State ex rel. v. Indus. Comm. (12/4/02)

Commission properly determined permanent total start date.

Vote: 7-0
Opinion by: Per Curiam

Cliff, State ex rel. v. Auburndale Co. (12/6/06)

Commission must resolve conflict between order granting permanent total which indicated that claimant had involuntarily left workforce and order denying temporary total which indicated that claimant had voluntarily left workforce.

Vote: 7-0
Opinion by: Per Curiam

Erieview Metal Treating Co., State ex rel. v. Indus. Comm. (5/10/06)

Last injurious exposure rule does not apply to allocation of permanent total disability; where evidence attributes disability to first claim, Commission properly allocated award of permanent total to that claim.

Vote: 5-2
Opinion by: Per Curiam

Gobich, State ex rel. v. Indus. Comm. (11/24/04)

Permanent total compensation is awarded when an individual cannot perform sustained remunerative employment; isolated and brief work activities do not establish ability to perform sustained remunerative employment.

Vote: 6-1
Opinion by: Per Curiam

Gonzales, State ex rel. v. Morgan (12/1/11)

Commission did not abuse discretion by denying permanent total based on failure of injured worker to participate in vocational rehabilitation where he was medically capable of sustained remunerative employment and had not attempted rehabilitation but been prevented from completing rehabilitation due to circumstances beyond his control.

Vote: 7-0 
Opinion by:
Per Curiam

Hoskins, State ex rel. v. Indus. Comm. (1/26/00)

Court holds that injured worker cannot receive permanent partial and permanent total for the same time periods. 

Vote: 5-2
Opinion by: Per Curiam

Kroger Co., State ex rel. v. Paysen (7/5/06)

Injured worker whose treating doctor says is incapable of sustained remunerative employment is not barred from receipt of permanent total by failing to accept job offered by employer.

Vote: 7-0
Opinion by: Per Curiam

LTV Steel Co., State ex rel. v. Indus. Comm. (3/27/02)

Permanent total cannot be denied because claimant refused a bona fide job offer where job offer was not within claimant's restrictions as found by attending physician.

Vote: 4-3
Opinion by: Justice Pfeifer

McDaniel, State ex rel. v. Indus. Comm. (5/15/08)

Commission did not abuse its discretion in determining that individual who was paid for activities done to promote business was engaged in sustained remunerative employment.

Vote: 7-0
Opinion by: Per Curiam

Nissin Brake Ohio, Inc., State ex rel. v. Indus. Comm. (12/20/10)

Commission can interpret medical evidence to find injured worker is physically incapable of working even if the medical evidence does not explicitly state that the injured worker is medically incapable of work.

Vote: 7-0
Opinion by: Per Curiam

Price, State ex rel. v. Cent. Serv., Inc. (12/4/02)

Special circumstances of case involving worker with 1969 injury who worked until 1997 justified applying permanent total maximum rate in effect in 1997 to determine permanent total award, rather than permanent total maximum rate in effect in 1969.

Vote: 4-3
Opinion by: Justice Resnick

Rohr, State ex rel. v. Indus. Comm.(8/18/10)

Evidence of possible new and changed circumstances supported Commission's order that employer was entitled to new medical exam of injured worker who had been previously awarded permanent total compensation to determine whether injured worker's condition had changed sufficiently that he was no longer permanently and totally disabled.

Vote: 7-0
Opinion by: Per Curiam

Tapp, State ex rel. v. Parsec Inc. (7/29/98)

Interlocutory award of permanent total did not require Commission to find injured worker permanent total.

Vote: 7-0
Opinion by: Justice Douglas
Common Ohio Workers' Compensation Terms Explained

Injured at Work?


Stewart Jaffy & Associates can help you receive the workers’ compensation benefits you are entitled to.  We are based in Columbus and represent injured workers throughout Ohio before the BWC, Industrial Commission and in court.

We also represent people who have social security disability claims or who have a disability claim before another state administrative agency (PERS, STRS, SERS or police and fire fighters disability).

Initial consultations with potential clients are free.  If you are interested in talking with us about a potential case, call us at (614) 228-6148. 
Stewart Jaffy & Associates Co., LPA | Attorneys at Law 
306 E. Gay St. | Columbus, OH 43215
Telephone: (614) 228-6148 | Fax: (614) 228-6140 
http://www.jaffylaw.com


  Please read our legal notice.