|
Injury
Cases:
Coverage, Ohio or Other State
(Court of
Appeals)
To see the full text of a
case on the Ohio Supreme Court's web site, click on the case name. To
return to the Case Index, click here.
| Portman v. Mabe (7/14/08) |
| R.C. 4123.54 requires factual determinations to be made regarding
whether employer and employee opted out of Ohio's workers' compensation
system, therefore summary judgment cannot be granted if there are
genuine issues of material fact. |
Vote: 3-0
Opinion by: Judge Willamowski
Court: Third Appellate District |
|
Standring
v. Gerbus Bros. Constr. Co. (10/25/02)
|
Where evidence indicated that
worker killed in Kentucky was
interviewed, hired, and worked in Kentucky, but worker lived in
Ohio
and employer was an Ohio corporation with its headquarters in Ohio,
issue
of whether or not there were "sufficient contacts" to entitle estate to
Ohio
workers' compensation coverage was factual issue which must be
determined
by jury.
|
Vote: 3-0
Opinion by: Judge Winkler
Court: First Appellate District
|
|
Turner
v. Admr., B.W.C. (5/9/03)
|
Worker
who was hired in Michigan and injured in New Jersey is eligible to
participate
in the Ohio Workers' Compensation system where he resides and pays
taxes
in Ohio and 70-80% of his work was performed in Ohio, even though he
had
received New Jersey workers' compensation benefits.
|
Vote: 3-0
Opinion by: Judge Fain
Court: Second Appellate District
|
|
| Villasana
v. Admr., BWC
(4/20/04) |
| Facts demonstrated that
injured worker was covered by the Texas
workers' compensation law and therefore was not entitled to participate
in the Ohio workers' compensation system. |
Vote: 3-0
Opinion by: Judge Edwards
Court: Fifth Appellate District |
|
|
