Stewart Jaffy &: Assoc. Co., LPA, Attorneys at Law
A Legal Professional Association
306 E. Gay Street, Columbus, OH  43315  

Tel: 614/228-6148

Stewart Jaffy & Assoc Home Page Site Index About Stewart Jaffy & Associates Ohio Workers' Compensation Information Ohio AFL-CIO Workers' Compensation Manual Social Security Disability Links
  Please read our legal notice.
Search
Stewart Jaffy & Assoc.
Firm Information
Our Lawyers
Directions
Ohio Workers' Compensation
Ohio Workers' Compensation Guide/FAQ
Rate Information
(1987 to present)
Current News
News Archives
(1996 to present)
Recent Ohio Supreme Court Decisions
Ohio Workers' Compensation Decision Summaries
(1998 to present)

Site Index

XML/RSS

Administrative Practice Cases: Miscellaneous
(Court of Appeals)

To see the full text of a case on the Ohio Supreme Court's web site, click on the case name. To return to the Case Index, click here.

Cesa, State ex rel. v. Indus. Comm. (4/10/07)
Where Commission issued incorrect notice of hearing, proper remedy is to vacate order and require Commission to issue proper notice of the issues to be considered at the hearing and then issue a new order after holding the hearing.
Vote: 3-0
Opinion by: Judge Bryant
Court: Tenth Appellate District
DaimlerChrysler Corp., State ex rel. v. Lopez (9/6/05)
R.C. 4123.511(J), governing recoupment of overpayments, does not apply to recoupment of amounts paid in error; statutory provision only applies to overpayments created by a judicial or administrative reversal of a previous order to pay compensation.
Vote: 3-0
Opinion by: Judge Klatt
Court: Tenth Appellate District
Gen. Elec. Co., State ex rel. v. Indus. Comm. (6/28/07)
BWC/IC could reactivate claim which IC "dismissed" for failure to comply with Resolution setting forth requirements for asbestos claim when those requirements were satisfied; claimant is not required to file new claim.
Vote: 3-0
Opinion by: Judge French
Court: Tenth Appellate District
Navistar, State ex rel. v. Indus. Comm. (8/10/04)
Commission did not violate due process by considering  temporary total denial on employer's appeal when claimant had not appealed DHO's denial of temporary total.  Appeal by one party at administrative level makes the entire order subject to review.
Vote: 3-0
Opinion by: Judge Brown
Court: Tenth Appellate District
Steinbrunner, State ex rel. v. Indus. Comm. (6/30/06)
Commission had no jurisdiction to consider whether intervening injury had occurred where no notice had been provided to claimant that that issue was going to be considered at hearing; consideration of issue not included in notice of hearing violates Due Process.
Vote: 3-0
Opinion by: Judge Travis
Court: Tenth Appellate District
Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp., State ex rel. v. Indus. Comm. (6/5/07)
SHO is not required to remand case to DHO for hearing "on the merits" when disagreeing with DHO decision to dismiss case.
Vote: 3-0
Opinion by: Judge Grey
Court: Tenth Appellate District
 


Stewart Jaffy & Associates Co., LPA | Attorneys at Law
306 E. Gay St. | Columbus, OH 43215
Telephone: (614) 228-6148 | Fax: (614) 228-6140
http://www.jaffylaw.com

.